Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<i>In Re Seagate, LLC</i>
For 24 years, the most effective way to defend against a charge of willful infringement has been to rely on the 'advice-of-counsel' defense; i.e., to assert that you consulted with, and relied upon, a competent opinion of counsel finding that there was no infringement of any valid claim of the patent at issue. Underwater Devices, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., 717 F.2d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (setting forth the duty-of-care standard).
The advice-of-counsel defense to willful infringement led to a harsh reality ' an accused infringer had two choices: 1) produce a written opinion and waive the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product related to the subject matter of the opinion; or 2) not produce an opinion so as not to waive the privilege and work product, but be virtually defenseless to willful infringement, because no opinion is produced. Until three years ago, the choice not to waive the privilege or to forgo an opinion also subjected an accused infringer to an adverse inference that an opinion was unfavorable. See Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH v. Dana Corp., 383 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (en banc decision rejecting the adverse inference rule). The Federal Circuit's ruling in Knorr-Bremse seemed to be an attempt to temper the harsh result of the duty-of-care standard. Interestingly, Judge Timothy B. Dyk, as the lone dissenter in Knorr-Bremse, called for eliminating the duty-of-care requirement as a factor in the willfulness and enhanced damages analysis, calling it a 'relic of the past.' Id. at 1352.
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.