Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<i>In Re Seagate, LLC</i>
For 24 years, the most effective way to defend against a charge of willful infringement has been to rely on the 'advice-of-counsel' defense; i.e., to assert that you consulted with, and relied upon, a competent opinion of counsel finding that there was no infringement of any valid claim of the patent at issue. Underwater Devices, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., 717 F.2d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (setting forth the duty-of-care standard).
The advice-of-counsel defense to willful infringement led to a harsh reality ' an accused infringer had two choices: 1) produce a written opinion and waive the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product related to the subject matter of the opinion; or 2) not produce an opinion so as not to waive the privilege and work product, but be virtually defenseless to willful infringement, because no opinion is produced. Until three years ago, the choice not to waive the privilege or to forgo an opinion also subjected an accused infringer to an adverse inference that an opinion was unfavorable. See Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH v. Dana Corp., 383 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (en banc decision rejecting the adverse inference rule). The Federal Circuit's ruling in Knorr-Bremse seemed to be an attempt to temper the harsh result of the duty-of-care standard. Interestingly, Judge Timothy B. Dyk, as the lone dissenter in Knorr-Bremse, called for eliminating the duty-of-care requirement as a factor in the willfulness and enhanced damages analysis, calling it a 'relic of the past.' Id. at 1352.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.