Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b>Practice Tip: </b> Dealing with the Surprise Government Interview
This article will help companies and their employees prepare for and, if necessary, deal with, a surprise interview by government agents conducted as part of an investigation of an allegedly defective product.
Periodically, the government conducts criminal investigations into alleged product defects. For example, as The Washington Post recently reported, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has opened a criminal investigation into the highly publicized case involving the contamination of pet food, in which various pet food companies determined that they had used melamine-contaminated ingredients from China in their products. (Patricia Sullivan, Criminal Probe Opened in Pet Food Scare, www.washingtonpost.com, April 21, 2007) Investigations such as this one are not isolated events. As noted in a paper issued in 2001 by the National Legal Center for the Public Interest:
The product liability arena has long been subject to criminalization ' High-
profile, product liability tragedies have incited legislatures to take aim directly at CEOs. The media routinely has pounced on product liability crises ' to bash big business. In turn, society has demanded that someone 'pay the price.' Legislators, representing constituents who are thirsty for retribution, have targeted not only corporations but also their CEOs. After all, someone needs to be held accountable.
(Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., et al., The Criminalization of the CEO, National Legal Center for the Public Interest, March 2001; see also Press Release
of national nonprofit consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen, 'Public Citizen Calls for Criminal Investigation of Breast Implant Manufacturer for Withholding Safety Data from FDA,' www.citizen.org, Oct. 12, 2006; Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. ”2068, 2070; Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. ”331, 333).
When conducting criminal investigations about possible corporate wrongdoing, in both alleged defective products matters and other cases, government agents often seek to interview company executives and other employees 'by ambush' outside the office place, to minimize the likelihood that a supervisor or a company lawyer might intervene to thwart the interview. There is nothing improper in using this investigative technique. Nevertheless, employees should know their legal rights and understand the risks they take when they submit to such surprise interrogations.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.