Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York recently held in two related cases under Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code involving failed hedge funds ' Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Master Fund, Ltd. (Case No. 07-12383) and Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Master Fund, Ltd. (Case No. 07-12384) ' that the mere presence of a registered office in the Cayman Islands, without 'pertinent' nontransitory economic activity in the Cayman Islands, was insufficient to recognize Cayman liquidation proceedings as 'main' or 'nonmain' and therefore the court denied relief under Chapter 15. In so holding, Bankruptcy Judge Burton Lifland parted with the more flexible approach to recognition, as noted in dicta in In re Sphinx, Ltd., 351 B.R. 103, 117 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006), providing that if no party objects, the bankruptcy court ' as a pragmatic matter ' could recognize a foreign proceeding as a nonmain proceeding despite the absence of any adhesive connection with the Cayman Islands beyond a registered office. The Bear Stearns decision highlights the rigid barriers to relief under Chapter 15. It is supported by the wording of the statute, but is the statute furthering the right policy? Should a statute intended to foster international cooperation in insolvency cases deny relief in support of well-established, common law foreign insolvency regimes?
The Bear Stearns decision is on appeal, but in the interim potential debtors (and their advisors) might be advised to undertake pre-bankruptcy planning to increase the likelihood the debtor will satisfy the formulaic determination of eligibility for relief under Chapter 15. In effect, the repealed ' 304 of the US Bankruptcy Code, Chapter 15 was added to the Code with the 2005 amendments to adopt the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency promulgated by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (the 'Model Law').
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.