Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
From spinach to pet food, peanut butter to seafood, tires to toothpaste, and most recently children's toys, there has been an extraordinary number of food and product recalls in recent months. The litigation stemming from these recent product and food safety failures presents a number of important insurance questions under general liability policies. These include questions about the scope of the products-operations hazard, whether non-products coverage is implicated by new theories advanced by the plaintiffs' bar, whether 'no injury' claims for economic harm can be shoehorned into coverage, and whether the many class action claims seeking medical monitoring for potential bodily injury will be covered under general liability policies. In the context of the lead paint toy recalls, the meaning of lead paint exclusions may also be at issue. In addition, as with traditional products liability litigation, the effect of the sistership, insured's own product, and impaired property exclusions will also be important in determining the extent to which general liability coverages may respond to the new wave of food and product safety litigation.
Scope of Products Hazard/Completed Operations Coverage
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.