Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
'Mass Actions': Eleventh Circuit Attempts to Find a Method to the Madness
In the May issue of PLLS, I identified a number of the many unanswered questions regarding CAFA's 'mass action' provisions, codified at 28 U.S.C. '1332(d)(11). See Rothman, 'CAFA: Finding a Method to the Madness of 'Mass Actions,” Product Liability Law & Strategy (May 2007) ('Mass Action Part I').
As that issue was going to press, the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sought to 'unravel some of the mysteries of CAFA's cryptic text' with respect to the 'mass action' provisions ' which the court (generously) characterized as an 'opaque, baroque maze of interlocking cross-references that defy easy interpretation.' Lowery v. Alabama Power Co., __ F. 3d __, 2007 WL 1062769, at *1, *8 (11th Cir. Apr. 11, 2007), affirming Lowery v. Honeywell Int'l Inc., 460 F. Supp. 2d 1288 (N.D. Ala. 2006). (The district court decision is cited at page 6 of Mass Action Part I.) In affirming the grant of remand in an action arising from the alleged discharge of pollutants, the court of appeals set forth the jurisdictional framework for a 'mass action.' Specifically, the court identified four jurisdictional threshold prerequisites for a 'mass action' removal: 1) numerosity ' 100 or more plaintiffs; 2) diversity ' any plaintiff is a citizen of a state different from that of any defendant ('minimal diversity'); 3) commonality ' plaintiffs' claims share common questions of law or fact; and 4) amount in controversy ' the aggregate value of plaintiffs' claims exceeds $5 million. Lowery, 2007 WL 1062769, at *10.
This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.