Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceLJN NewslettersNewsSections

<b>Practice Notes: </b>Supreme Court Justices Ask Tough Qs In 'Judge Alex' Case

By Tony Mauro
January 28, 2008
Seven may be Eric Brunstad Jr.'s unlucky number. Brunstad, who works out of Bingham McCutchen's Hartford, CT office, has been building an impressive U.S. Supreme Court practice in recent years by taking on out-of-the-way bankruptcy and estate law cases ' one of which, Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (S.Ct. 2006) ' turned into a very high-profile case because he was representing J. Howard Marshall, the late Anna Nicole Smith's ex-husband, who lost. The 2006 case probably brought the High Court more publicity than any case since Bush v. Gore in 2000.

Jan. 14, 2008 marked Brunstad's seventh oral argument before the Supreme Court and it was a doozy, with justices hitting him harder than almost any lawyer in recent memory. The case was Preston v. Ferrer, 06-1463, an arbitration case that also has a modicum of celebrity appeal because of the identity of Brunstad's client. Brunstad was arguing on behalf of Alex Ferrer, a former Florida judge who stars in the syndicated 'Judge Alex' TV show in which, ironically enough, he arbitrates disputes between ordinary folks over issues like falling trees and damaged furniture.

The dispute that attracted the Supreme Court's attention was between Ferrer and his former California agent, Arnold Preston, over their management agreement, which contains an arbitration clause. The issue was whether the dispute should be handled under the Federal Arbitration Act or under the special California law that governs talent agents' contracts.

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.