Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Food-borne illnesses and tainted food products have been a staple of product liability litigation for many decades and continue to be so now. In the last five years, however, food litigation has also turned to broader policy questions: Does tuna contain too much mercury and, if so, should someone have told us? Are fast-food restaurants to blame when someone gains too much weight or develops diabetes? Does the fact that certain foods contain partially hydrogenated oil (or trans fat, salt, sugar, or caffeine) create a cause of action on anyone's part? A new generation of food-related litigation, and class action litigation in particular, has been launched.
By and large, these policy-oriented food lawsuits have failed to survive early dispositive motions, regardless of the legal theory under which they are brought. See Mills v. Giant of Maryland, 441 F. Supp.2d 104 (D.D.C. 2006) (dismissing, as pre-empted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, plaintiffs' strict product liability claim against milk producers for failing to warn of potential lactose intolerance). Partly in response, a trend has emerged in the last 12 to 24 months. Local legislatures and public health departments are enacting ordinances and regulations concerning food, which purport to address pressing public health problems such as obesity. Some enactments ban the sale or use of certain food ingredients, while others seek to compel new or additional labeling of food products. These laws and regulations are themselves being challenged in court, sometimes successfully. This dance of litigation, legislation and regulation, and responsive litigation creates particular challenges for manufacturers and sellers and calls for a particular set of strategic responses.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.