Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Foley & Lardner LLP announced that Harold L. Kaplan and Mark F. Hebbeln are joining the firm's Chicago office as partners in the Business Reorganizations Practice. Their practices have a primary focus on the representation of indenture trustees and bondholders. Both Kaplan and Hebbeln join the firm from Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. Kaplan will lead Foley's Corporate Trust and Bondholders Rights practice. He recently served as co-chair of Drinker Biddle's Corporate Restructuring practice group and head of its Corporate Trust and Bondholder Rights practice group. He previously served as chairman of Gardner Carton & Douglas LLP, playing an instrumental role in the firm's merger with Drinker Biddle & Reath in 2007. Hebbeln will also serve as a member of the firm's Corporate Trust and Bondholders Rights practice. He has represented indenture trustees and bondholder interests in national bankruptcy cases and in health care reorganizations, insolvencies and other proceedings. He currently serves as co-chair of the American Bar Association's Trust Indenture Act Annotation Project.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.