Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Medical Malpractice Law & StrategyKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Contingency Fees for 'Medico-Legal Services'

By William Ramos
February 27, 2008

Lawyers are routinely called on to apply their expertise to effectively evaluate and litigate cases. When lawyers do not possess the expertise themselves, they must seek others for assistance. To satisfy this need, a number of legal consultation organizations have been formed in recent decades, particularly to service the medical malpractice field. Usually for a contingency fee, such 'medico-legal services' locate expert witnesses, help prepare the experts to testify, and consult with counsel to aid in those aspects of the lawsuit which require expert knowledge.

In a recent case in which this author was involved as a court attorney, when the New York medical malpractice action settled without a trial, the plaintiffs refused to pay the agreed contingency fee to the consulting firm for, inter alia, obtaining medical expert witnesses. The medico-legal services organization sued the plaintiffs and their attorney in the firm's home state, Virginia, pursuant to the forum-selection clause of the agreement. The plaintiffs, through the same attorney who represented them in the settled medical malpractice action, responded by commencing an action in New York Supreme Court, seeking a declaration that the contingency contract between the consulting firm and the litigant and attorney they purported to serve, violated New York public policy and was, therefore, unenforceable.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.