Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Claims of Negligence and Failure to Warn Were Time-Barred
In Morgan v. Abco Dealers Inc., 01 Civ. 9564, S.D.N.Y., Dec. 11, 2007, Plaintiff, a hospital's nurse since 1990, was diagnosed with Type I, Type IV, and Class V allergic sensitivity to latex. After she claimed disability in 1999, a doctor conducting a June 14, 1999, independent medical examination opined that the plaintiff could only return to work in a 'latex-free' environment. Defendant Abco Dealers Inc., a buying cooperative of medical device distributors, sought dismissal of plaintiff's Oct. 30, 2001 product liability action alleging, among others, negligence and failure to warn. The court partly denied Abco's motion for summary judgment on claims that plaintiff's action was untimely and federally preempted, and that it did not make express warranties to plaintiff. In deeming her negligence, strict liability, and failure to warn claims time-barred, the court ruled that Abco proved that plaintiff first learned of her injury when diagnosed with an allergy to powdered gloves on Sept. 29, 1995. Also the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 preempted her breach of warranty claims as to gloves sold by Abco beginning on Sept. 30, 1998.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?