Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In coverage litigation and bad faith actions between insurers and policyholders, courts' views as to the discoverability of claim file material have varied significantly, depending on the jurisdiction and the specific fact pattern presented. Privilege issues concerning insurer claim files have proven difficult because it is in the 'very nature of an insurer's business to investigate and evaluate the merits of claims.' Cutrale Citrus Juices USA, Inc. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Group, 2004 WL 5215191 at *2 (M.D.Fla. Sept. 10, 2004). Courts will thus often face a highly fact-specific inquiry concerning whether claim file documents are prepared in 'anticipation of litigation' and therefore qualify as work product.
Similarly, under the attorney-client privilege, only the provision of legal advice is protected; relying on this truism, some courts have opined that, '[i]n the insurance context, to the extent that an attorney acts as a claims adjuster, claims process supervisor, or claims investigation monitor, and not as a legal advisor, the attorney-client privilege does not apply.' Country Life Ins. Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2005 WL 3690565 at *5-7 (C.D.Ill. Jan. 31, 2005).
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.