Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Comcast Corporation and Pando Networks, Inc. announced late last month that they will lead an industry-wide effort to create a peer-to-peer ('P2P') Bill of Rights and Responsibilities ('BRR') for P2P users and Internet Service Providers ('ISPs').
The two companies plan to collaborate and engage with industry experts, other ISPs and P2P companies, content providers and others to set a framework for the BRR that can serve as best practices. The purpose would be to clarify what choices and controls consumers should have when using P2P applications as well as what processes and practices ISPs should use to manage P2P applications running on their networks. For example, P2P users should have the right to control their computers' resources when using P2P applications.
In addition, Comcast and Pando plan to conduct a test of Pando Network Aware P2P technology on Comcast's fiber-optic network. The purpose of the test will be to capture and analyze the data flow associated with downloading a file using Pando's P2P application. These tests, along with tests Pando will conduct on a variety of other ISP networks, including cable, DSL, fiber and wireless, will measure things such as performance, speed, distance and geography, as well as the bandwidth consumption impact to the ISP. Comcast and Pando plan to publish the results of these tests so other ISPs can benefit from understanding how P2P applications might be optimized for traveling over different types of networks in different environments and geographies.
This announcement builds on Comcast's March 27th announcement to collaborate with BitTorrent and the broader Internet and ISP community to address more effectively issues associated with rich media content and network capacity management. It also builds on Pando's recent announcements of its P2P test results that demonstrated Pando's ability to reduce network congestion and speed content delivery by routing P2P traffic more effectively across cable, DSL, and fiber broadband networks.
The Pando test will provide additional data to help Comcast migrate to a protocol-agnostic network management technique by the end of this year. The arrangement is yet another example of how these technical issues can be worked out through private business discussions and without the need for government intervention.
'Working together, Comcast and Pando can help lead the discussion about what consumers should expect in terms of a P2P Bill of Rights and Responsibilities for P2P users and ISPs,' said Tony Werner, Comcast Cable's Chief Technology Officer. 'Doing so is in the best interest of everyone involved ' ISPs, P2P companies and consumers. We hope to get other industry experts, ISPs and P2P companies together this spring and publish the P2P Bill of Rights and Responsibilities later this year. By having this framework in place, we will help P2P companies, ISPs and content owners find common ground to support consumers who want to use P2P applications to deliver legal content.'
'At Pando, we have always believed that good P2P applications give users control. Now we are committing to lead the industry in codifying that,' said Robert Levitan, CEO of Pando Networks. 'In addition, we need more data and analysis of how P2P applications deliver content over a variety of different networks. By sharing the test methodology and results, all P2P companies and ISPs can learn how to deliver legal content more effectively. This will ultimately benefit consumers who are relying on P2P programs as well as content providers who are interested in delivering their content to consumers where and how they want it.'
The two companies plan to collaborate and engage with industry experts, other ISPs and P2P companies, content providers and others to set a framework for the BRR that can serve as best practices. The purpose would be to clarify what choices and controls consumers should have when using P2P applications as well as what processes and practices ISPs should use to manage P2P applications running on their networks. For example, P2P users should have the right to control their computers' resources when using P2P applications.
In addition,
This announcement builds on
The Pando test will provide additional data to help
'Working together,
'At Pando, we have always believed that good P2P applications give users control. Now we are committing to lead the industry in codifying that,' said Robert Levitan, CEO of Pando Networks. 'In addition, we need more data and analysis of how P2P applications deliver content over a variety of different networks. By sharing the test methodology and results, all P2P companies and ISPs can learn how to deliver legal content more effectively. This will ultimately benefit consumers who are relying on P2P programs as well as content providers who are interested in delivering their content to consumers where and how they want it.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.