Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Federal Officer Removal Jurisdiction Upheld in Agent Orange Cases

By James Aiosa and Paul V. Majkowski

In late February, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a trio of opinions in a series of cases arising out of the use of chemical herbicides during the Vietnam War. These decisions constitute the latest chapter in the Agent Orange litigations that have been part of the American legal landscape since the late 1970s and that are commonly considered to be among the seminal mass tort cases. These latest cases involve the claims of U.S. veterans who were not bound by the original class settlement because the settlement fund had been exhausted prior to the alleged manifestation of their injuries, and of an association of Vietnamese nationals, the Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange ('VAVAO').

In the recent decisions, the Second Circuit, affirming the rulings of U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein, held that: 1) the federal court had subject matter jurisdiction over the U.S. veterans' claims based on the federal officer removal statute, Isaacson v. Dow Chem. Co., 517 F.3d 129 (2d Cir. 2008); 2) the 'government contractor defense' precluded plaintiffs' claims, i.e., the manufacturers were not liable because the herbicide products were made in accordance with the government's specifications, In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig., 517 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2008); and 3) the chemical companies' manufacture and supply of the chemical herbicides did not violate customary international law norms proscribing the use of chemical weapons and, thus, did not form the basis of a claim under the Alien Tort Statute, Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange v. Dow Chem Co., 517 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2008). (By orders dated May 7, 2008, the Second Circuit denied petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc of these decisions.)

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

When Is a Repair Structural or Nonstructural Under a Commercial Lease? Image

A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."