Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For the past six years, the Bush Administration has been embroiled in foreign policy disputes, leading some to claim that the United States has alienated our friends and damaged our credibility around the world. In particular, many critics condemn the Administration's controversial unilateralism. But one need not endorse unilateralism to observe that the mercurial and contrarian perspectives sometimes held by our allies also deserve a share of the blame. And as these perspectives have dogged U.S. diplomats at the negotiating table, so too have they affected U.S. enforcement and regulatory authorities.
For example, French courts recently resurrected their long-dormant blocking statute to slap away the unwanted hand of American law enforcement on its soil. In December 2007, the Cour de Cassation rejected the challenge of a French attorney trained in the U.S. to his criminal conviction and Euro 10,000 fine for attempting to gather evidence on behalf of the California Insurance Commissioner. See Cour de Vassation, Chambre Criminelle [Cass. crim.] [highest court of
ordinary jurisdiction], Dec. 12, 2007, Bull. crim., No. 7168. This unprecedented criminal conviction ' the first in the statute's history ' may have been intended to forewarn U.S. authorities who attempt to conduct uncoordinated surrogate investigations. Moreover, it offers yet another reminder that unilateralism begets protectionism, and visa versa. Global enforcement requires diplomacy.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.