Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Securities & Exchange Commission's Securities Offering Reform dramatically changed the landscape of registered public offerings. Issuers and underwriters would do well to take advantage of these changes while staying aware of potential fraud liability. See Final Rule: Securities Offering Reform, Release Nos. 33-8591 and 34-52056, 70 Fed. Reg. 44,722, available at www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8591.pdf. Previously, written offers could only be made after a registration statement had been filed and only in the form of a statutory prospectus. Now, written offers can be made in much freer form through a 'free writing prospectus.' Through this new free writing prospectus, some issuers can even make offers regardless of whether a registration statement has been filed.
A free writing prospectus ' which is any written offer outside of the statutory prospectus ' can take many forms: printed materials, e-mails, Internet Web sites, radio or television broadcasts, faxes, and even widely distributed voice mails. It can contain any information, including information not contained in the registration statement as long as there is no conflict. A free writing prospectus usually needs to be filed with the SEC by the issuer, but not by underwriters unless it is likely to be broadly disseminated. Furthermore, it must contain a legend advising the potential investor to read the registration statement and indicating how it can be obtained. While many issuers still need to have a registration statement on file to use free writing prospectuses, well-known seasoned issuers can now make written offers even before filing through free writing prospectuses.
The free writing prospectus has the advantage of carrying less potential liability than the usual statutory prospectus. Much of recent securities fraud litigation has been under ' 11 and ' 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, two sections that often overlap, but are distinct. Great news ' but: ' 11 establishes liability for misstatements in a registration statement, which include the final prospectus and Exchange Act reports that are incorporated by reference. A free writing prospectus, since it is not considered part of the registration statement, does not carry ' 11 liability. Section 12(a)(2) establishes liability for misstatements in a 'prospectus.' And, like a statutory prospectus or final prospectus, a free writing prospectus still carries ' 12(a)(2) liability. Issuers and underwriters using free writing prospectuses should be well aware of this point.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.