Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the recently decided AWG Leasing Trust case, No. 1:07-CV-857 (N.D. Ohio 2008), a federal district court found against a taxpayer that engaged in a cross-border sale-leaseback of a waste-to-energy facility located in Germany. The court found, as a matter of fact, that the lessee, a consortium of German municipalities that burned its garbage and purchased electricity from the plant, was “nearly certain” to exercise its fixed price purchase option at the end of the lease term. Based on that finding of a compelled exercise of the purchase option, the court used a “substance over form” legal underpinning to hold that the leaseback was not a “true lease” ' use and possession of the asset were certain to be returned to the lessee at the end of the lease. The case is appealable to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and we understand at press time that the taxpayers intend to appeal.
The court disregarded the sale-leaseback and disregarded the nonrecourse debt that the taxpayer had incurred to purchase the facility. The overall transaction was recharacterized as a financing (non-true lease) of the equity portion of the purchase price that was paid by the taxpayer lessor to the lessee at closing. This deemed loan from the lessor to the lessee results in original issue discount (interest) income to the lessor. In addition all of the depreciation and interest expense deductions claimed by the taxpayer with respect to the facility and the nonrecourse debt were disallowed.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.