Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
With more than $2 trillion of imported products entering the United States every year, consumer product safety is receiving more attention than ever from the government, consumer protection groups, safety advocates, and the media. In the past year alone, tires, dog food, and toothpaste from China have all been recalled. Most troubling were recent toy recalls, including one that involved millions of dangerous toys distributed by Mattel. The challenges of ensuring the safety of consumer products, regardless of whether they are produced domestically or abroad, include the ever-present demand for new products, faster inventory turnover, and greater consumer consumption.
The integrity and safety of products, especially imports, is under scrutiny, and consumers are questioning their confidence in goods. The current Congress will almost certainly approve legislation that will significantly impact the recall process and method for ensuring product safety. In an effort to prepare for this, President Bush established the Interagency Working Group on Import Safety (“IWGIS”) by Executive Order on July 18, 2007. The group is chaired by Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt, and includes officials from many other agencies such as the Department of Agriculture and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”). IWGIS is commissioned to review and assess current procedures directed at ensuring the safety of products exported to the United States; identify the methods by which U.S. importers may enhance the safety of imported products; and survey practices of federal, state, and local governmental agencies concerning import safety to highlight best practices and improve coordination among agencies.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.