Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Right-of-Publicity Amendments Extend Protections, But Marilyn Monroe LLC Suffers New Setback

By Stan Soocher
September 29, 2008

Los Angeles entertainment attorney Robert A. Finkelstein accompanied Nancy Sinatra to Washington, DC, last summer for a U.S. Congressional hearing on a proposal for terrestrial radio stations to pay performance royalties to air sound recordings. Sinatra was a key artist-rights witness before the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property. (The subcommittee later voted to support the performance royalty legislation, then sent it to the House Judiciary Committee.) As SoundExchange Executive Director John Simson brought this author over in the Congressional hearing room to greet Sinatra and the long-time Sinatra-family attorney, Finkelstein praised a recent change in Washington state's right-of-publicity statute. The amendment, which took effect in June 2008, eliminated a personality's domicile as a bar to bringing a right-of-publicity suit.

The California-based Sinatra family had been busy licensing Frank Sinatra product to mark 10 years since the legendary crooner passed away. California had recently enacted a major change in its statutory right of publicity, too ' in response to litigation that involved the residuary rights of Frank Sinatra's late friend Marilyn Monroe. After federal district courts in California and New York ruled that Monroe had no ability to include a post-mortem right of publicity in her will when she died in 1962, the California legislature amended its descendible publicity right to apply to personalities who died up to 70 years before the California statute originally took effect on Jan. 1, 1985. But the amendment to Calif. Civ. Code Sec. 3344.1 hasn't helped the Monroe legacy. Both California and New York federal district courts have now decided that, though Monroe often worked in California, her domicile was New York, which has no descendible publicity right.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.