Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Los Angeles entertainment attorney Robert A. Finkelstein accompanied Nancy Sinatra to Washington, DC, last summer for a U.S. Congressional hearing on a proposal for terrestrial radio stations to pay performance royalties to air sound recordings. Sinatra was a key artist-rights witness before the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property. (The subcommittee later voted to support the performance royalty legislation, then sent it to the House Judiciary Committee.) As SoundExchange Executive Director John Simson brought this author over in the Congressional hearing room to greet Sinatra and the long-time Sinatra-family attorney, Finkelstein praised a recent change in Washington state's right-of-publicity statute. The amendment, which took effect in June 2008, eliminated a personality's domicile as a bar to bringing a right-of-publicity suit.
The California-based Sinatra family had been busy licensing Frank Sinatra product to mark 10 years since the legendary crooner passed away. California had recently enacted a major change in its statutory right of publicity, too ' in response to litigation that involved the residuary rights of Frank Sinatra's late friend Marilyn Monroe. After federal district courts in California and New York ruled that Monroe had no ability to include a post-mortem right of publicity in her will when she died in 1962, the California legislature amended its descendible publicity right to apply to personalities who died up to 70 years before the California statute originally took effect on Jan. 1, 1985. But the amendment to Calif. Civ. Code Sec. 3344.1 hasn't helped the Monroe legacy. Both California and New York federal district courts have now decided that, though Monroe often worked in California, her domicile was New York, which has no descendible publicity right.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.