Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

RIAA Tempers Tactics

By Eric R. Chad and William D. Schultz
January 29, 2009

From the days of duplicating tapes, records and compact discs through the uploading and downloading of digital music, consumers have become desensitized to the liability of copying music. Reports of college students downloading thousands of songs, teenagers using uninformed parents' computers to load pirated music onto MP3 players and the formation of companies dedicated to sharing music has caused the recording industry to fight the trend.

The recording industry estimates that music piracy has cost it billions of dollars during the past 15 years. Facing the potential for an industry-wide collapse, the Recording Industry Association of America (“RIAA”) undertook an aggressive litigation campaign, covered extensively by Internet Law & Strategy, to protect itself and its constituents from copyright infringement by suing individual file sharers. After fighting a public relations battle over some of its tactics, the RIAA has chosen to temper its aggressiveness. In December, it announced a “new approach [that] dispenses with one of the most contentious parts of the lawsuit strategy, which involved filing lawsuits requiring ISPs [Internet service providers] to disclose the identities of file sharers.” See, Sarah McBride and Ethan Smith, “Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits,” Wall St. J. online, Dec. 19, 2008. The RIAA is instead forming relationships with ISPs that maintain the online accounts of the consumers.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.