Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Business Manager Denied New Trial In Malmsteen Case
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York refused to grant a judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial for the former business manager of musician Yngwie Malmsteen in a suit by the musician over missing income. Malmsteen v. Berdon LLP, 05 Civ. 00958 (RJH). Manager James Lewis and business manager Michael Mitnick had represented Malmsteen from the mid-1990s until 2000. Malmsteen alleged Mitnick and Berdon LLP, the firm for which Mitnick worked, made Lewis' embezzlement of large sums of the artist's money possible. The district court then decided that Malmsteen's suit wasn't barred by a three-year statute of limitations for malpractice for traditional accounting services. See, Malmsteen v. Berdon LLP, 477 F.Supp.2d 655 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).
An expert witness for Malmsteen testified that music-industry business managers are “customarily responsible for ' maintain[ing] awareness of all professional and personal income earned by [a] client and [ensuring] the collection of this income” and “generally ' do everything the client would do for himself if the client had the time and was not working.” After a trial, the jury ruled for the plaintiff on breach of contract and breach of fiduciary obligation claims. (The judge ruled for the defendants as a matter of law on Malmsteen's fraud claim.) Of the breach claim, the district judge subsequently noted: “[t]here was sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could have found that Mitnick, acting as a business manager, agreed to monitor plaintiffs' income and verify that payments to plaintiff were properly accounted for.” Mitnick argued there could be no breach because the jury awarded no damages on that claim, but the court explained: “The jury's failure to award damages on plaintiff's breach of contract claim was likely its attempt to comply with the [c]ourt's instruction that they could not award 'actual damages more than once for the same loss' if they found for plaintiff on both the breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty claims.” The jury awarded Malmsteen $450,000 on the fiduciary-breach claim.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.