CPLR ' 6501 in Mortgage Foreclosure Actions and RPL ' 290 Short-term Leases

This author previously suggested consideration of amending CPLR ' 6501. The article herein addresses an additional reason for amending CPLR ' 6501, to wit: whether a properly filed N/P in a mortgage foreclosure plenary action binds to its results a later created interest in the subject realty evidenced by any type of lease or other possessory interest agreement for a term of less than three (3) years.

19 minute read April 28, 2009 at 09:40 AM

Law.com Staff

This author previously suggested consideration of amending CPLR ' 6501. See Sharrow, “A Possible Need to Amend CPLR ' 6501,” New York Real Estate Law Reporter

This premium content is locked for New York Real Estate Law Reporter subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN New York Real Estate Law Reporter

Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends

Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more

Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

Real Property Law

Adverse Possessor Provided Insufficient Evidence to Support TackingTown’s Installation of Guardrails Did Not Constitute a TakingMortgagee Entitled to Deficiency JudgmentLandowner Adequately Alleged Trespass During Renovation

August 13, 2026

Entrepreneurship Is Already Hard: Rising Above Extraordinary Personal Crises to Build an Award-Winning Professional Reputation

Entrepreneurship. It has such a romantic ring, doesn’t it? When we hear the word, we think of incredibly successful people who must lead a charmed life. But the truth of the matter is often far from that. Just ask Melissa Rogozinski whose recent book, Becoming Phoenix, tells a much different story.

August 01, 2026

Applying the Zero Trust Model to Manage Risks of Agentic AI

Agentic AI introduces risks that are novel and complex, but the most effective response is a familiar one. Zero Trust answers the problem of when an AI agent misfires on its own by constraining what an agent can do rather than betting on how it will behave.

August 01, 2026

California’s AI Transparency Stack: From State Obligation to Adoption Strategy

California is betting that it can accelerate AI adoption by acting as a demanding, trusted buyer, and that the governance evidence it extracts through procurement can become infrastructure the rest of the market reuses.

August 01, 2026

CPLR ' 6501 in Mortgage Foreclosure Actions and RPL ' 290 Short-term Leases

This premium content is locked for New York Real Estate Law Reporter subscribers only

Continue Reading

Real Property Law

Entrepreneurship Is Already Hard: Rising Above Extraordinary Personal Crises to Build an Award-Winning Professional Reputation

Applying the Zero Trust Model to Manage Risks of Agentic AI

California’s AI Transparency Stack: From State Obligation to Adoption Strategy