Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Infringement/Parody
Deciding the Family Guy TV show's inclusion of the song “I Need a Jew” was a fair-use parody of the tune “When You Wish Upon a Star,” the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York noted: “It was the [U.S.] Supreme Court's intention for the parody doctrine to protect new works that have reason to fear they will be unable to obtain a license from copyright holders who wish to shield their works from criticism.” Bourne v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 07 Civ. 8580(DAB). The district court explained of the Family Guy episode: “After hearing his friends talk about how men with Jewish-sounding names have helped them to achieve financial success, [the show's character] Peter decides that he 'needs a Jew' to help him with his finances.” The court found, among other things: “Defendants' use of 'When You Wish Upon a Star' calls to mind a warm and fuzzy view of the world that is ultimately nonsense; wishing upon a star does not, in fact, make one's dreams come true. By pairing Peter's 'positive,' though racist, stereotypes of Jewish people with that fairy tale world-view, 'I Need a Jew' comments both on the original work's fantasy of Stardust and magic, as well as Peter's fantasy of the 'superiority' of Jews. The song can be 'reasonably perceived' to be commenting that any categorical view of a race of people is childish and simplistic, just like wishing upon a star.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.