Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Restoring Copyrights Ruled Violation of First Amendment
The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado granted summary judgment for a group of artists and businesses that challenged '514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 17 U.S.C. '104A (the Act). Golan v. Holder, 01-cv-01854-LTB. The Act restored U.S. copyright protection to foreign authors' works that had fallen into the public domain, other than for expiration of copyright term (e.g., from failure to renew a copyright or to place a copyright notice on a published work) but were still protected in their own countries. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit had ruled for the federal government on the plaintiffs' challenges to the Copyright Term Extension Act, which extended U.S. copyright protection for 20 additional years, but remanded the case on the plaintiffs' First Amendment challenge to '514, which implemented Art. 18 of the international Berne Convention. See, Golan v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007).
On remand, the District of Colorado noted: “Congress has a legitimate interest in complying with the terms of the Berne Convention. The Berne Convention, however, affords each member nation discretion to restore the copyrights of foreign authors in a manner consistent with that member nation's own body of copyright law. In the United States, that body of law includes the bedrock principle that works in the public domain remain in the public domain. Removing works from the public domain violated Plaintiffs' vested First Amendment interests. In light of the discretion afforded it by the Berne Convention, Congress could have complied with the Convention without interfering with Plaintiffs' protected speech. ' Accordingly ' to the extent Section 514 suppresses the right of reliance parties to use works they exploited while the works were in the public domain ' Section 514 is substantially broader than necessary to achieve the Government's interest.”
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.