Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado granted summary judgment for a group of artists and businesses that challenged '514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 17 U.S.C. '104A (the Act). Golan v. Holder, 01-cv-01854-LTB. The Act restored U.S. copyright protection to foreign authors' works that had fallen into the public domain, other than for expiration of copyright term (e.g., from failure to renew a copyright or to place a copyright notice on a published work) but were still protected in their own countries. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit had ruled for the federal government on the plaintiffs' challenges to the Copyright Term Extension Act, which extended U.S. copyright protection for 20 additional years, but remanded the case on the plaintiffs' First Amendment challenge to '514, which implemented Art. 18 of the international Berne Convention. See, Golan v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007).
On remand, the District of Colorado noted: “Congress has a legitimate interest in complying with the terms of the Berne Convention. The Berne Convention, however, affords each member nation discretion to restore the copyrights of foreign authors in a manner consistent with that member nation's own body of copyright law. In the United States, that body of law includes the bedrock principle that works in the public domain remain in the public domain. Removing works from the public domain violated Plaintiffs' vested First Amendment interests. In light of the discretion afforded it by the Berne Convention, Congress could have complied with the Convention without interfering with Plaintiffs' protected speech. ' Accordingly ' to the extent Section 514 suppresses the right of reliance parties to use works they exploited while the works were in the public domain ' Section 514 is substantially broader than necessary to achieve the Government's interest.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.