Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Counsel defending manufacturers who are alleged to have designed defective vehicles that have caused serious traffic accidents often have an uphill battle in convincing jurors that the design of their client's vehicle was not wholly responsible for the accident and resultant injuries and damages. If the defect is not at issue, the defense attorney may seek to prove that the driver of the vehicle was at least partially at fault ' and that often requires extensive analysis of various factors.
The good news is that jury pools are populated with persons who have first-hand knowledge of reckless and aggressive drivers. They are also well aware of the frequency of accidents and their toll in lives and injuries, i.e., 6,420,000 crashes and 42,636 deaths each year (2005), a rate of 115 deaths per day. In addition, as courts and jurors are called on to examine the various facts presented in these cases and, in order to apportion causality, they are most often provided with reports and testimony from accident reconstructionists, employed by law enforcement or private consulting firms. The reconstructionists compute the coefficient of friction of the road surface, measure skid marks in evidence on the road's surface, analyze the vehicles' damage to determine impact forces, make estimates about the speed of the vehicles, and generally provide a description of the physical forces at work in various accident scenarios. Such computations, however, only tell part of the accident story. An equally important dimension involves the human factors issues involved and, in particular, driver reaction times. This is where the plaintiff's counsel will present the other side of the story.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.