Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Much has been written about the attachment and perfection of security interests. Less attention has been paid to how those liens, once perfected, can be transferred to other creditors. Transfers of security interests can occur, for example, in connection with the transfer of debt secured by liens or with the substitution of a secured party. (Note, a substitution of secured parties may occur, for example, when one collateral agent is succeeded by another. U.C.C. ' 9-207(c)(3) also permits secured parties to repledge collateral separate from the debt, but discussion of such procedures is beyond the scope of this article.) Ease of transferability of perfected security interests is critical to ensuring access to capital in financing transactions, especially in securitizations. The assignee of a security interest wants to succeed to both the assignor's perfected lien and the priority of that lien. (Note, technically, the rules discussed herein apply with respect to assignments by the assignor's predecessors in interest, in the case of multiple assignments. For the sake of clarity, however, we refer only to the immediate assignor, not its predecessors in interest.) Failure of an assignment to achieve either of these goals could result in a forfeiture to junior secured parties or the debtor's bankruptcy estate.
Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, recognizing the importance of facilitating transfers of liens, imposes minimal requirements on assignments of security interests perfected by the filing of financing statements, or possession or control. However, when it comes to Article 9 collateral subject to federal or other state laws, such as certain mobile goods and intellectual property, the UCC often defers to such federal or state regimes. See U.C.C. ' 9-311(a). The intersection between the UCC and these other laws is not always seamless, as illustrated by the recent decision of a Texas bankruptcy court in Clark Contracting Services Inc. v. Wells Fargo Equipment Finance (In Re: Clark Contracting Services Inc. 299 B.R. 789 (Bankr. W.D. Tex 2008)). That lack of seamlessness can disrupt commercial and consumer markets significantly.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.