Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

General Growth Properties

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 29, 2009

To the surprise of many, when General Growth Properties Inc. (“GGP”) commenced a Chapter 11 proceeding in April 2009, it caused 166 solvent bankruptcy remote entities that were current on all their indebtedness (the “General Growth SPEs”) that each owned a single mall property to also file Chapter 11 petitions. In August, in a highly anticipated test of the legal structures underpinning securitized financing, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York denied a motion to dismiss bankruptcy cases filed by General Growth SPEs. In re: General Growth Properties, Inc., 2009 WL 2448423, No. 09-11977 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 11, 2009). The GGP case is significant as it is the first decision to analyze comprehensively a bankruptcy remote structure in many years, and it seems to undercut many market assumptions that these entities were largely insulated from bankruptcy risk.

In the past 20 years or so, real estate finance has evolved from mortgage loans made by a bank or institution that held the loans until maturity and maintained its relationship with the borrowers, to non recourse loans utilizing so called “bankruptcy remote” structures, which loans were then securitized and sold to investors as commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”). The economics of CMBS loans were favorable to borrowers because, among other things, the bankruptcy remote structure was implemented to isolate the assets from other parts of a borrower's business, ensuring that cash flows would be dedicated solely to the specific CMBS debt. Perhaps more importantly, CMBS loans were designed to minimize the risk that a borrower would utilize bankruptcy to delay a lender from foreclosing a defaulted mortgage, or from taking advantage of the cramdown provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.