Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Internet gambling proponents suffered a major setback when a federal appeals court refused to strike down a 2006 law in which Congress banned all Internet gambling transactions that would be illegal in the gambler's state. In Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Association v. Attorney General of the United States, 08-1981, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected arguments that the law should be declared void for vagueness. Writing for the court, U.S. Circuit Judge Dolores K. Sloviter found that the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA) “clearly provides a person of ordinary intelligence with adequate notice of the conduct that it prohibits.”
Lawyers for the gaming interests focused on the statute's use of the phrase “unlawful Internet gambling,” which, they argued, lacks any “ascertainable and workable definition.” But Sloviter found that a plaintiff who raises a facial challenge to a statute on vagueness grounds “must demonstrate that the law is impermissibly vague in all of its applications.” With that test in mind, Sloviter found that the UIGEA “cannot be deemed impermissibly vague in all its applications” because several states prohibit all gambling activity or specifically ban Internet gambling.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?