Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Internet gambling proponents suffered a major setback when a federal appeals court refused to strike down a 2006 law in which Congress banned all Internet gambling transactions that would be illegal in the gambler's state. In Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Association v. Attorney General of the United States, 08-1981, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected arguments that the law should be declared void for vagueness. Writing for the court, U.S. Circuit Judge Dolores K. Sloviter found that the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA) “clearly provides a person of ordinary intelligence with adequate notice of the conduct that it prohibits.”
Lawyers for the gaming interests focused on the statute's use of the phrase “unlawful Internet gambling,” which, they argued, lacks any “ascertainable and workable definition.” But Sloviter found that a plaintiff who raises a facial challenge to a statute on vagueness grounds “must demonstrate that the law is impermissibly vague in all of its applications.” With that test in mind, Sloviter found that the UIGEA “cannot be deemed impermissibly vague in all its applications” because several states prohibit all gambling activity or specifically ban Internet gambling.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.