Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Schneider Electric, a provider of power and control solutions headquartered in France, recently announced it had settled a three-year-old patent litigation with Chint, one of the largest manufacturers of low-voltage devices in China. The settlement amount of CNY 157.5 million (~ USD 23 million) paid by Schneider is believed to be the largest for a patent litigation settlement in China. The decisive victory for Chint puts a fresh spotlight on the fast-changing patent litigation landscape in China.
Chint originally paid CNY 500 (~ USD 70) in 1997 in filing fees for a utility model application at the State Intellectual Property Office (“SIPO”) of China. The utility model was granted in a little more than 15 months without undergoing any substantive examination. The Chinese patent office grants three types of patents:
Armed with its 10-year patent, Chint sued Schneider in 2006 and was awarded the landmark judgment in 2007. The Wenzhou Intermediate People's Court ordered Schneider to pay more than CNY 330 million (~ USD 45 million) and to stop the manufacture and sale of five of its products that allegedly infringe Chint's utility model.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?