Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In today's world, information flows freely at the click of a mouse. Nearly 200 million blogs, or approximately one for every 30 people on earth, can chronicle the lives of Internet users in publicly accessible posts. Nineteen million Twitter users can complain about their jobs instantly by “Tweeting.” A reported 33% of Americans online are on Facebook, where they can upload embarrassing or questionable digital photos. Technology connects ' and exposes ' us like never before.
This exponential growth has significant consequences for the workplace. Not only may employees be accessing such sites at work, creating a drag on productivity, they may be using social networking and blogging sites to harass co-workers, criticize their supervisors, disclose company trade secrets, or simply discuss controversial topics in a manner that may be identified with the company. With all of these possibilities and more, it is not surprising that, in a 2007 nationwide survey from the American Management Association and ePolicy Institute, one-third of employers reported that they had fired an employee for misusing the Internet.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.