Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 80 Cal. Rptr. 3d 781, 800 (2008), review granted and opinion superseded in 85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 688 (Oct. 22, 2008), California's Fourth District Court of Appeal substantively altered the wage and hour landscape through its conclusion that California meal and rest period regulations only impose a passive obligation on employers to make breaks available. This legal finding, according to the Brinker court, renders meal and rest period claims hopelessly uncertifiable as a class action, as the employee's option to waive a meal or rest period requires a case-by-case inquiry into the reason each individual break was not taken. While the Brinker decision is currently pending review by the California Supreme Court, Brinker's analysis is not the be-all end-all when it comes to class adjudication of meal and rest period claims. Regardless of the outcome in Brinker, numerous meal and rest break theories will continue to be suitable for class adjudication.
Claims Involving Uniform Barriers to Breaks
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.