Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Complaint over Oral Agreement for TV-Network Work Is Dismissed
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a suit against George Steinbrenner that alleged the New York Yankees owner failed to live up to an oral agreement regarding the role of plaintiff Robert M. Gutkowski, former Madison Square Garden president, in the creation and operation of the televised Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network. Gutkowski v. Steinbrenner, 09 Civ. 7535(RJS). Gutkowski had met with Steinbrenner and other New York Yankees executives over several years. But District Judge Richard J. Sullivan found: “First, Plaintiff fails to plead adequately the compensation term of the putative agreement, which precludes Plaintiff from asserting his claim for breach of contract. Second, the purported oral agreement is unenforceable under New York's statute of frauds, which bars Plaintiff's breach of contract and quasi-contract claims. Third, Plaintiff's claim for fraudulent inducement fails to state a cause of action independent from Plaintiff's breach of contract claim. Fourth, all of Plaintiff's claims are untimely pursuant to New York's statute of limitations.” On the breach-of-contract claim, District Judge Sullivan specifically noted “that Plaintiff's allegations that Defendant promised that Plaintiff would be 'compensated fairly' or 'fairly compensated,' in conjunction with the allegation that 'one measure' to calculate this 'fair and reasonable value' is a two to three percent equity interest 'traditionally paid to persons providing the kind of services provided by Plaintiff to Defendant,' are insufficiently definite as a matter of law.” The district also further explained: “An unwritten agreement 'to pay compensation for services rendered ' in negotiating the purchase [of] ' a business opportunity ' or an interest therein' is void under New York's statute of frauds [N.Y. Gen. Oblig. L. '5-701(a)(10)].”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.