Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FDA Certification Does Not Shield Generic Drug Maker from Suit
Generic drug manufacturers are not insulated from lawsuits by a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process that certifies such drugs as the “bioequivalent” of their brand-name predecessors, a federal judge in Philadelphia has ruled. In the 29-page decision rendered in In re Budeprion XL Marketing & Sales Litigation, U.S. District Judge Berle Schiller refused to dismiss a suit brought by consumers who were previously taking Wellbutrin, a brand-name antidepressant drug, and claim they experienced side effects upon switching to generic buproprion. The suit alleges that two manufacturers ' Teva Pharmaceuticals and Impax Laboratories ' became aware of the potential problem but failed to warn the public about differences between the name-brand and generic versions of the product that affected the release rate of the active ingredient. Schiller applied the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Wyeth v. Levine, and concluded that generic drug manufacturers, like manufacturers of the previously approved name-brand drugs their products mimic, also have a continuing duty to issue warnings about any new hazards that arise after approval.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.