Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Drug & Device News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
July 29, 2010

With New Notification Scheme, Settlement Payout May Be Higher

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals has agreed to pay $103 million to settle the multidistrict litigation that claimed it and other drug companies inflated the published average wholesale prices that the government and other third-party payers use to set drug company reimbursement rates. The amounts it will actually pay to consumers are expected to be higher than in most similar past settlements because of a clause in the agreement that calls for the third-party payers, like insurance companies, to provide a settlement administrator with information about payments made by insurance policy holders. This will allow for notification to those eligible to make claims, rather than simply an unfocused public notification. Wells Wilkinson, director of the Prescription Access Litigation project at Community Catalyst Inc., which was involved in negotiating the claims administration process for the settlement, said, “Typically, one of the hardest things to do is to identify consumers who can participate in the settlement.” Jennifer Fountain Connolly, Of Counsel to the Washington office of the plaintiff's law firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, says a similar notification plan was used in the $350 million settlement of New England Carpenters Health Benefits Fund, et al. v. McKesson Corp., a case that also involved claims of inflation of average wholesale prices of drugs. “That was the first time we used the same mechanism, and it greatly increased the claims rate,” Connolly said. “It multiplies by several factors the number of consumers who make claims.”

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.