Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Expert Testimony and the Changes to FRCP Rule 26

By Bruce S. Schaeffer and Henry Chan
September 28, 2010

Federal rules will soon be changing to apply the work-product protections of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(3)(A) and (B) to experts' draft reports and expert-attorney communications. According to the report that led to these rule changes (“Report of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to the Chief Justice of the United States and Members of the Judicial Conference of the United States”), this means such documents will no longer be discoverable except for:

  • those that relate to the expert's compensation;
  • facts and data provided by counsel that the expert considered; and
  • assumptions provided by counsel that the expert considered.

The amendments will be effective Dec. 1, 2010, pursuant to ratification of the proposals by the U.S. Supreme Court on July 15, 2010; however, care must be taken because the changes will not be applied retroactively. Thus, it may be wise for counsel to request discovery delays in the next few months to give their experts the protection of the upcoming changes.

The report notes that expert testimony has become critical to the litigation process and that the new rules will eliminate the “tortuous” procedures experts had to take to avoid preparing draft reports, taking notes, or making records of preliminary opinions.

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.