Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Tursi: You have been a business development trainer, coach, and consultant to law firms for over 16 years. What motivated you to develop a new approach for developing rainmakers?
Freeman: During my career, I have seen many different approaches for improving the business development skills of lawyers ' training sessions, personal coaching, “train the trainers,” lunch and learns featuring internal rainmakers, mentoring programs, conferences, books, experiential learning, accountability groups, and tracking systems ' you name it, firms have tried it. With CMOplaybook', I have combined a number of these best practices to create an internally managed system that can help lawyers at any level become better rainmakers.
The idea for this program took hold during my tenure as Co-Chair of the Legal Marketing Association's Annual Conference last year. It became clear to me that we collect the best and the brightest to preach to the choir ' other legal marketers ' but it is the lawyers themselves who desperately need this information. My first task was to collect some of the “greatest hits” in business development, to package the knowledge shared in a conference in a way that is accessible to a wider audience. To that end, I recorded nine sessions with a faculty of 28 Chief Marketing Officers and other law firm marketing, sales, and service experts, covering the key areas of business development. My production team and I then spent hundreds of hours sifting through the recordings to extract the best ideas, with the final result being hundreds of invaluable approaches that can translate into millions of dollars of new revenue over a career.
As you well know, information, without implementation, is never enough. My next challenge was to build an approach that combined adult learning techniques with the benefits of personal coaching in a way that could be delivered and managed internally by a firm. By incorporating action worksheets, business development templates, participant's and leader's guides, accountability groups, and personal sustainability and tracking systems, CMOplaybook' has evolved into a radically different, self-paced learning and action system that can help lawyers build truly exceptional practices.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.