Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Art of Appealing MPAA Film Ratings

By Alan R. Friedman
January 26, 2011

A variety of ingredients go into the success or failure of a motion picture. Without a screenplay that works, it is hard for a motion picture to do well. Similarly, the budget, the director, the actors and the subject matter are all factors that can contribute significantly to a movie's performance at the box office. So, too, do the size and effectiveness of a film's marketing and publicity campaign. One other factor of great importance is the rating that the Classification and Ratings Administration (CARA) of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) assigns to a film.

It is no surprise that the more restrictive the rating, the narrower the audience eligible to see the film. A film rated “NC-17,” meaning that no one under the age of 17 can attend it, or “R,” so that anyone under the age of 17 must be accompanied by a parent or guardian, will be limited to a smaller pool of potential moviegoers than less restrictively rated movies. Even some adults who may be interested in a film's subject matter, actors or director nonetheless will not see a film if it is rated “R” because they anticipate that it will contain scenes or language that they would find offensive or more intense than they are comfortable seeing. Thus, an “arthouse” film intended for people over the age of 18 may suffer if it receives an R rating, even though the target audience is not foreclosed by its rating. This problem is magnified if a movie receives an NC-17 rating. Not only does the NC-17 rating signify the presence of more intense, potentially offensive content in the film, but also NC-17 rated movies are more difficult to market and exhibit than less restrictively rated movies. For example, television ads generally cannot be shown before 10:00 p.m., print advertising is harder to place and some exhibitors are reluctant to show NC-17 rated movies.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.