Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Art of Appealing MPAA Film Ratings

By Alan R. Friedman

A variety of ingredients go into the success or failure of a motion picture. Without a screenplay that works, it is hard for a motion picture to do well. Similarly, the budget, the director, the actors and the subject matter are all factors that can contribute significantly to a movie's performance at the box office. So, too, do the size and effectiveness of a film's marketing and publicity campaign. One other factor of great importance is the rating that the Classification and Ratings Administration (CARA) of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) assigns to a film.

It is no surprise that the more restrictive the rating, the narrower the audience eligible to see the film. A film rated “NC-17,” meaning that no one under the age of 17 can attend it, or “R,” so that anyone under the age of 17 must be accompanied by a parent or guardian, will be limited to a smaller pool of potential moviegoers than less restrictively rated movies. Even some adults who may be interested in a film's subject matter, actors or director nonetheless will not see a film if it is rated “R” because they anticipate that it will contain scenes or language that they would find offensive or more intense than they are comfortable seeing. Thus, an “arthouse” film intended for people over the age of 18 may suffer if it receives an R rating, even though the target audience is not foreclosed by its rating. This problem is magnified if a movie receives an NC-17 rating. Not only does the NC-17 rating signify the presence of more intense, potentially offensive content in the film, but also NC-17 rated movies are more difficult to market and exhibit than less restrictively rated movies. For example, television ads generally cannot be shown before 10:00 p.m., print advertising is harder to place and some exhibitors are reluctant to show NC-17 rated movies.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?