Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It seems like you can't read a legal publication these days without coming across an article about a judge in hot water. For instance, in September, it was reported that “[a] West Virginia Supreme Court justice has refused to take himself out of a case involving the state cap on punitive damages, even though he pledged during his election campaign that he would never vote to overturn the law imposing the cap.” See “New Recusal Controversy in W.Va. High Court” (The National Law Journal, Sept. 27, 2010). Are these types of incidents simply occurring more often and, therefore, warrant reporting? We don't think so. Rather, we believe that the explosion of information about judges now available online has enabled researchers to uncover indications of possible bias, prejudice and other relevant tidbits. For instance, with respect to the above-noted incident, the justice's comments are easily found via a search online (and, notably, the justice ultimately did recuse himself. See “Ketchum Reverses Course, Recuses Himself” (West Virginia Record, Sept. 28, 2010)).
When it comes to researching information about a judge, several questions should come to mind:
How to Conduct the Research
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.