Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Film Investment Negotiations Lead to Personal Jurisdiction over Out-of-State Defendants
The California Court of Appeal, Second District, ruled that a California trial court has personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants in a suit brought over an investment in a proposed film. Cameo FJ Entertainment v. Braidy, B220241. Plaintiffs Keith and Lee Pettle, owners of the California-based Cameo FJ Entertainment, sued in Los Angeles Superior Court alleging fraud and additional misrepresentations over their investment in the proposed motion picture Victims, which was never produced. According to the court of appeal: “In 2004, respondent Michael Kunath [a resident of Washington state] and representatives of Carousel Pictures [the latter aren't parties to the suit] met with appellants Keith and Lee Pettle co-owners of Cameo FJ Entertainment at the Chateau Marmont in Los Angeles ' The eight months following the Los Angeles meeting consisted of e-mails and phone negotiations between the Kunath and Carousel representatives. The e-mails involved multiple parties, across multiple jurisdictions.” (Co-defendants in the case are from Switzerland and Lichtenstein.) The superior court granted the defendants motion to dismiss. But reversing and remanding, the court of appeal noted, in an unpublished opinion, that the meeting in Los Angeles “provided the groundwork for the contract that later followed, and to establish the confidence required for Cameo FJ Entertainment to execute the power of attorney that led to the alleged losses. While it also appears that there were some negotiations that occurred in Washington State, however, like many modern business negotiations, a significant amount of negotiation occurred via e-mail and telephone.” The court of appeal added: “Any losses as a result of those communications form a relationship between that action and the forum involved ' California.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.