Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As Aristotle recognized in approximately 350 BCE, “all men by nature desire to know.” The passage of time has not diminished this pursuit of knowledge, particularly by attorneys zealously representing clients. Attorneys recognize that obtaining facts efficiently and accurately is frequently outcome determinative. Yet, there are ethical limitations on how attorneys may obtain information that, if transgressed, can render the evidence inadmissible and subject the attorney to discipline and other adverse consequences. This article articulates some of the common issues that a lawyer should consider under Model Rule 4.2, but the manner in which Model Rule 4.2 is applied across different jurisdictions may vary. See Ellen J. Messing and James S. Weliky, Contacting Employees of an Adverse Corporate Party: A Plaintiff's Attorney's View, 2008 A.L.I.'A.B.A. Continuing Legal Educ., Advanced Emp. L. & Litig. 1527. Before engaging in potentially restricted communications, it is recommended that you familiarize yourself with how the ethics committees and courts have applied Model Rule 4.2 in your local jurisdiction.
One important restraint on counsel's information-gathering pursuits is reflected in the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4.2 (“Model Rule 4.2″), the so-called “no-contact rule,” which prohibits a lawyer from communicating with a person whom the lawyer knows to be represented by counsel absent that counsel's consent. This article addresses some of the common issues and questions that may arise when applying Model Rule 4.2 in practice.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.