Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Corporate CounselorKickerFeaturesTopicsLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Parameters of the Witness No Contact Rule

By Lawrence S. Spiegel and Deborah M. Chow

As Aristotle recognized in approximately 350 BCE, “all men by nature desire to know.” The passage of time has not diminished this pursuit of knowledge, particularly by attorneys zealously representing clients. Attorneys recognize that obtaining facts efficiently and accurately is frequently outcome determinative. Yet, there are ethical limitations on how attorneys may obtain information that, if transgressed, can render the evidence inadmissible and subject the attorney to discipline and other adverse consequences. This article articulates some of the common issues that a lawyer should consider under Model Rule 4.2, but the manner in which Model Rule 4.2 is applied across different jurisdictions may vary. See Ellen J. Messing and James S. Weliky, Contacting Employees of an Adverse Corporate Party: A Plaintiff's Attorney's View, 2008 A.L.I.'A.B.A. Continuing Legal Educ., Advanced Emp. L. & Litig. 1527. Before engaging in potentially restricted communications, it is recommended that you familiarize yourself with how the ethics committees and courts have applied Model Rule 4.2 in your local jurisdiction.

One important restraint on counsel's information-gathering pursuits is reflected in the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4.2 (“Model Rule 4.2″), the so-called “no-contact rule,” which prohibits a lawyer from communicating with a person whom the lawyer knows to be represented by counsel absent that counsel's consent. This article addresses some of the common issues and questions that may arise when applying Model Rule 4.2 in practice.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.