Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be “organic,” “green,” or “eco-friendly.” While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical. As a result of past disposal practices and spills of perc, many current and former dry cleaning sites are contaminated. By some estimates, 75% of dry cleaner facilities operated in past decades have caused environmental contamination. Cleanup costs range from tens of thousands of dollars to several million dollars.
Forest Park National Bank & Trust v. Ditchfield, 10 CV 3166 (N.D. Ill. May 21, 2010), presents a typical “dry cleaner contamination” fact pattern. In that case, a bank foreclosed on an Illinois residence, and then filed a lawsuit in federal court against the owners and operators of an adjacent strip mall and its dry cleaning tenant. The bank contends that after acquiring the residence, it learned that perc from the dry cleaner had leached into the soil and groundwater under the residence. Even though the residence is located on a block targeted by the city for a big redevelopment project, the bank claims that it has not been able to sell the property because of the perc contamination. The bank sought compensatory damages in excess of $100,000. Certain defendants filed a third-party complaint against their insurer alleging that it failed to provide defense and indemnity against the underlying suit.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.