Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Test Item Transparency
We hypothesize that if attorneys, judges, and psychologists were asked to rate the usefulness of data from psychological tests administered in the context of family law matters, attorneys and judges would assign higher ratings than would psychologists. Dianna Gould-Saltman, a former family law attorney, now a judge sitting in the Los Angeles Superior Court, has opined that attorneys like tests because they “break things down to numbers, and we understand numbers.” [Gould-Saltman's views were expressed in an article entitled "Testing, One, Two, Three, Testing: An Attorney Perspective," appearing in the Journal of Child Custody, 2(1&2), 2005, pp. 71-81.]
Some of the problems inherent in psychological testing conducted in the context of litigated custody disputes have been addressed previously in The Matrimonial Strategist [Martindale, D. A. (2005). Psychological Assessment: Evaluating the Evaluations. The Matrimonial Strategist, 22:12, 3-5]. Here, we address the problems that are inalterably linked to test-taker motivation and to the susceptibility [and possible ease] of psychological test data to deliberate distortion. Though the topic of test-taker motivation has been addressed at length in many articles and text chapters, the susceptibility of psychological test data to deliberate distortion has received less attention, and methods for addressing the problem are not as effective as non-psychologists are led to believe they are.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.