Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
COPYRIGHT ASSIGNMENTS/CO-OWNERS' RIGHTS
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin decided that co-owners of a copyright can grant exclusive rights in their work to third parties on their own. Thus, a music video company that obtained copyright assignments from two of the three co-creators of the music video “What What (In the Butt)” (WWITB) had the right to file suit over an episode of the TV series South Park that recreated a portion of WWITB to parody the viral-video craze. Brownmark Films LLC v. Comedy Partners, 10-CV-101. District Judge J.P. Stadtmueller noted that “no one can credibly argue that the risk of limiting the other co-owner's rights [to independently exploit the work] can be used to artificially restrict the alienability of the co-owner's right to transfer their interest in the copyright.” The district court's decision takes issue with opposing precedent from the Ninth Circuit.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?