Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: Finding the Line in the Sand
Recently described as the “ever expanding statute that has swallowed the Internet,” (see, Orin S. Kerr, “Congress Considers Increasing Penalties, Adding Minimum Sentences to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,” The Volokh Conspiracy Blog (May 24, 2011)), the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), 18 U.S.C. '1030, was promulgated in 1984 in order to strengthen the government's ability to prosecute computer crimes involving national security secrets, computers belonging to the federal government, and personal financial information. Since its enactment, the CFAA has been amended numerous times, however, significantly broadening its reach. In its current incarnation ' which is the subject of yet another possible amendment ' the CFAA “potentially regulates every use of every computer in the United States and even many millions of computers abroad.” Orin S. Kerr, “Vagueness Challenges to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,” 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1561 (May 2010) (detailing the legislative expansion of the CFAA).
The scope of the CFAA is the subject of an emerging split among federal courts of appeals as highlighted by a recent opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which rejected the claim that its decision would make criminals out of millions of employees who might utilize their work computers for personal use.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.