Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Presenting Bankruptcy Concepts to Juries

By Philip Oliss and Sarah K. Rathke
September 26, 2011

Bankruptcy attorneys may conceive of their field as being a highly specialized and insulated world. Until recently at least, these practitioners tended to practice in bankruptcy courts only; those courts conveniently specialized in bankruptcy, and everyone gathered in those courts spoke essentially the same language. A common belief among bankruptcy practitioners has been that disputed matters invariably sound in equity, thus posing very little danger that an attorney would ever encounter a jury. Moreover, bankruptcy-related issues are sometimes thought to be highly technical, often involving complex accounting or sometimes regulatory or tax principles, such that adjudication by a jury is undesirable in any event.

But juries can appear where one least expects them. Our firm, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, recently won a defense verdict in a jury trial involving claims by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) against a Chapter 11 debtor and former savings and loan holding company, AmFin Financial Corporation. The FDIC had placed AmFin's subsidiary, AmTrust Bank, into receivership and was seeking to recover at least some of its receivership costs from the bank's parent. Although the full explanation of the bank's deterioration is complicated, as a savings and loan specializing in residential mortgage lending, AmTrust Bank was hit particularly hard by the 2008 (and onward) financial crisis, when its customers began defaulting on their mortgages at record levels.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.