Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The popular social networking website Facebook currently boasts 750 million active users, 50% of whom log in on any given day. A recent study by the Pew Research Center indicates that 13% of Americans use Twitter. Google+, the new social networking upstart that is expected to give Facebook a run for its money, grew to more than 10 million users in two weeks of its invitation-only test phase. LinkedIn, a more professional social networking site, reached 100 million users in March of this year. Finally, many others utilize alternate social networking websites, including MySpace, as well as blogs, e-mail list servs, or online chat rooms.
These numbers are impressive to say the least, but what do they mean for employers? Well, given the popularity of such sites, it is likely that your employees are using at least one form or another of social media. Odds are that your employees use the sites to post information about their workplace, supervisors, or co-workers. Recognizing this trend, many employers have implemented or at least considered implementing Internet/social media policies in an effort to protect their reputations, protect their employees, and prevent the dissemination of confidential or proprietary information on the Internet. Many of these policies likely contain blanket prohibitions of disparaging, discriminatory, or defamatory remarks in relation to the company or its employees. These policies seem to make perfect sense, but unfortunately, employers need to re-think them in light of the National Labor Relations Board's (“NLRB”) recent decision in Hispanics United of Buffalo, Inc., Case No. 3-CA-27872, 2011 NLRB LEXIS 503 (N.L.R.B. Sept. 2, 2011).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.