Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For today's multistate employer, it is rare to see a set of case facts that touches on only one jurisdiction. Take the example set by a 2010 age discrimination case out of New York. In Hoffman v. Parade Publications, the plaintiff worked and resided in Georgia; the decision to end his employment was made in New York at the defendant's New York headquarters, and he received news of his termination while in West Virginia. Such a factual scenario begs the question: Which state's law applies? Is it the law of the state where the allegedly discriminatory decision is made? Where the company is headquartered? Or the law of the state where the impact of any allegedly discriminatory decision is felt (generally, where the plaintiff resides)?
This article addresses recent case law on this issue, ending with an analysis of the New York Court of Appeals' decision in Hoffman. It concludes that the application of a state's laws beyond its borders conflicts with the longstanding and well-accepted principle that a state's law should only be given effect within its boundaries. Therefore, states should not extend their anti-discrimination statutes to those working outside their borders unless the employee can plead and prove that the alleged discrimination had an actual impact within the jurisdiction.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.