Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For generations, federal bankruptcy law has given trustees and debtors-in-possession (collectively, for simplicity, trustees) in Chapter 7 liquidation and Chapter 11 reorganization cases the power to “avoid,” or invalidate, certain pre-bankruptcy preferential transfers and to add the recovered proceeds to the bankruptcy estate. Since the trustee's avoidance powers extend to transfers intended as security, not just absolute transfers, even secured claims are vulnerable to avoidance when the necessary preference elements can be established. Secured creditors have been comforted by several decisions over the past two decades that have made it easier to defeat preference attacks. A recent case, O&G Leasing, LLC v. First Security Bank (In re O&G Leasing, LLC), 456 B.R. 652 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2011), nevertheless provides a timely reminder to lenders that the power to avoid preferences remains a potent and oft-used weapon in the trustee's arsenal.
Preferences Generally
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.