Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bill Seeks Greater Oversight of Some Devices
On Dec. 14, 2011, Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Herb Kohl (D-WI) introduced legislation in the U.S. Senate that would increase U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight of some medical implant products. If passed, the Medical Device Patient Safety Act would permit the FDA to better monitor the safety of implanted medical devices by requiring manufacturers to agree to collect post-market safety data as a condition of approval to market their devices to the public. While this type of data is currently required only of manufacturers of the highest-risk devices ' those that have been approved through the rigorous Pre-market Approval (PMA) process ' the new legislation would extend the agency's post-market surveillance powers to cover devices that have entered the market under the 510(k) system. (A device cleared under the 510(k) system must be shown to be substantially equivalent to a product already on the market, but it is not itself approved by the FDA as a safe product.) As part of their impetus for introducing the bill, its authors cited to concerns raised by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) when it placed the FDA on its “high risk list” (see www.gao.gov/highrisk/risks/safety-security/public_health.php), as well as to the case of the DePuy hip implant, which was recalled only after the FDA and the manufacturer learned through foreign registries that patients were experiencing problems with the device. If the bill becomes law, manufacturers failing to conduct required post-market monitoring of their product's safety could find their permission to sell rescinded.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.