Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bill Seeks Greater Oversight of Some Devices
On Dec. 14, 2011, Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Herb Kohl (D-WI) introduced legislation in the U.S. Senate that would increase U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight of some medical implant products. If passed, the Medical Device Patient Safety Act would permit the FDA to better monitor the safety of implanted medical devices by requiring manufacturers to agree to collect post-market safety data as a condition of approval to market their devices to the public. While this type of data is currently required only of manufacturers of the highest-risk devices ' those that have been approved through the rigorous Pre-market Approval (PMA) process ' the new legislation would extend the agency's post-market surveillance powers to cover devices that have entered the market under the 510(k) system. (A device cleared under the 510(k) system must be shown to be substantially equivalent to a product already on the market, but it is not itself approved by the FDA as a safe product.) As part of their impetus for introducing the bill, its authors cited to concerns raised by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) when it placed the FDA on its “high risk list” (see www.gao.gov/highrisk/risks/safety-security/public_health.php), as well as to the case of the DePuy hip implant, which was recalled only after the FDA and the manufacturer learned through foreign registries that patients were experiencing problems with the device. If the bill becomes law, manufacturers failing to conduct required post-market monitoring of their product's safety could find their permission to sell rescinded.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.