Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Independent Creation Testimony Defeats Rap Riff Copyright Claim
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that the testimony of defendant Teriyakie Smith ' writer of the rap song “Betcha Can't Do it Like Me,” recorded by co-defendants rap group D4L ' established independent creation of the composition, thereby defeating a copyright infringement claim by the owner of the rap song “Come Up,” recorded by Woodlawn Click. Watt v. Butler, 10-14710. The suit was filed over a three-note riff. Plaintiff Charles Watt contended that he sold or gave away up to 15,000 CDs of Woodlawn Click's recording in the southeastern United States. In an unpublished opinion, the Eleventh Circuit observed Watt's “evidence of access [that] depends largely on the assumption that members of the Atlanta rap community share music among themselves and that the song 'Come Up' became popular and was widely shared for many years” was too speculative to establish either D4L or Smith had access to “Come Up.” However, the appeals court did agree with the Northern District of Georgia federal court that “Watt could show that 'Come Up' and 'Betcha' were substantially similar because the riff, which is a copyrightable element, is the same in both songs.” The appeals court then considered Smith's testimony “that he wrote the music for 'Betcha,' and specifically the riff, in 2004 using three adjacent keys on his laptop keyboard and the 'Fruity Loops' music production software.” The appeals court decided that Smith's testimony, “though not corroborated by documentary evidence or by a disinterested third-party, was plausible. ' As a result, even if Watt had made out a prima facie case based on a showing of access and substantial similarity, the evidence of independent creation would have negated the presumption of copying that arose from Watt's prima facie case.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.