Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Independent Creation Testimony Defeats Rap Riff Copyright Claim
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that the testimony of defendant Teriyakie Smith ' writer of the rap song “Betcha Can't Do it Like Me,” recorded by co-defendants rap group D4L ' established independent creation of the composition, thereby defeating a copyright infringement claim by the owner of the rap song “Come Up,” recorded by Woodlawn Click. Watt v. Butler, 10-14710. The suit was filed over a three-note riff. Plaintiff Charles Watt contended that he sold or gave away up to 15,000 CDs of Woodlawn Click's recording in the southeastern United States. In an unpublished opinion, the Eleventh Circuit observed Watt's “evidence of access [that] depends largely on the assumption that members of the Atlanta rap community share music among themselves and that the song 'Come Up' became popular and was widely shared for many years” was too speculative to establish either D4L or Smith had access to “Come Up.” However, the appeals court did agree with the Northern District of Georgia federal court that “Watt could show that 'Come Up' and 'Betcha' were substantially similar because the riff, which is a copyrightable element, is the same in both songs.” The appeals court then considered Smith's testimony “that he wrote the music for 'Betcha,' and specifically the riff, in 2004 using three adjacent keys on his laptop keyboard and the 'Fruity Loops' music production software.” The appeals court decided that Smith's testimony, “though not corroborated by documentary evidence or by a disinterested third-party, was plausible. ' As a result, even if Watt had made out a prima facie case based on a showing of access and substantial similarity, the evidence of independent creation would have negated the presumption of copying that arose from Watt's prima facie case.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.