Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An oft-recurring task for counsel (both inside and outside) is analyzing whether a new lawsuit filed in state court can properly be removed to federal court, or whether the client (often an out-of-state company) must be left to the tender mercies of the state forum. The passage by Congress of the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011 (the “JVCA” or the “Act”) doesn't open the door to the federal courthouse a great deal wider, as the Class Action Fairness Act did. Nonetheless, the points of law settled by the JVCA may provide defendants with removal opportunities that they didn't have formerly, at least in some circuits. Further, in supplying uniform rules on a number of removal issues, the Act brings a measure of predictability to removal practice, which alone makes the statute significant.
The JVCA was signed into law on Dec. 7, 2011, and became effective on Jan. 6, 2012, applying to all cases removed to federal court on or after that date. While the statute also deals with jurisdiction, venue and transfer rules in the federal courts, this article focuses on the statute's most significant changes, those affecting removal from state to federal court. The most salient points of the Act as affecting removal are summarized below.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.