Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An oft-recurring task for counsel (both inside and outside) is analyzing whether a new lawsuit filed in state court can properly be removed to federal court, or whether the client (often an out-of-state company) must be left to the tender mercies of the state forum. The passage by Congress of the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011 (the “JVCA” or the “Act”) doesn't open the door to the federal courthouse a great deal wider, as the Class Action Fairness Act did. Nonetheless, the points of law settled by the JVCA may provide defendants with removal opportunities that they didn't have formerly, at least in some circuits. Further, in supplying uniform rules on a number of removal issues, the Act brings a measure of predictability to removal practice, which alone makes the statute significant.
The JVCA was signed into law on Dec. 7, 2011, and became effective on Jan. 6, 2012, applying to all cases removed to federal court on or after that date. While the statute also deals with jurisdiction, venue and transfer rules in the federal courts, this article focuses on the statute's most significant changes, those affecting removal from state to federal court. The most salient points of the Act as affecting removal are summarized below.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.